Showing posts with label invitations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label invitations. Show all posts

Invitation Send-Off

Thursday, April 29, 2010
We decided that a pretty invitation deserves a nice presentation, so, since we came in under budget for the invites, we had them calligraphed.

When initial calligrapher recommendations were out of our budget, I took to the internet and found Nicole of The Left Handed Calligrapher. She's very nice and super personable, and does an amazing job. As it turns out, Nicole has been featured in SMP and D Weddings, but when I booked her I hadn't heard of her work yet.

Mr. Oyster-the-artist was excited about this. When we went and picked up the finished envelopes, he said, "They're like little pieces of art!" Very cute.

So, check them out! The "font" we chose was Copperplate. I actually liked Spencerian better, but I really wanted the envelopes to be "mailable." I took pictures of this particular set so that I could show them off without revealing where a family or friend lives. Do you know this person?


I think I underestimated the formality of these invitations. Now, with the letterpress and everything, they look very formal. I even had a brief freak-out and called my mother, worried that we had outclassed ourselves with the invitation! My mother said, no, we hadn't, and also pointed out helpfully that it's too late to worry about that now. Thanks, mom!

In between ordering the invitations and sending them, I built our wedding website. Later, I decided that I didn't want it hanging around for all the Internet to see, so I password protected it, creating custom logins for each guest. But with no website card, how would I tell them about it?

We came up with a label system. I bought clear computer labels, and formatted them with each invite's custom username and password. I initially planned to put these on the back of the invitations, so they'd be subtle, but my mom (there she goes again) pointed out that most people won't automatically turn the invitation over, and by the time they get to the computer and see "check your invitation for username/password" they might not have it with them, etc., etc....

So we put it on the outer flap of the inside envelope. When people open the inner envelope, the label will disappear from view and the invitation will still stand on its own. Very clever! (While we are happy with this solution, please tell me I'm not alone in saying that computer labels are a giant pain in the ass.)

Mr. Oyster decided that he wanted to perfectly line up the labels on the envelopes, and came up with a complicated measuring system. I would have just stuck them on there, but I didn't say that, instead thanking Mr. Oyster for making the invitations such a high priority.

This mysterious measuring system involved Post-its.


When he realized I was taking his picture and possibly going to show it to you all, he dissolved into what is perhaps the cutest fit of giggles I've seen in a grown man:


And then he got to work.



Okay, check it out:



It's a dark grey, which matches the back of our outer envelopes (and the invite text). We stuffed, sealed and stamped them, and were ready to go! Does anyone else love those USPS wedding stamps? They just happened to match our envelopes perfectly.

The whole time we were putting these together, we kept lamenting that we didn't have Nicole make us our own envelope set that we could keep. But sure enough, hidden in the bottom of the stack of envelopes, was a nice surprise.

Nicole very sweetly made us our own commemorative invitation envelopes, beautifully addressed to us, and we put an invite in it and decided to put it in our little "wedding keepsake" box. We even put a stamp on it. This way, our kids can look at it one day and say, "Ha, ha, Mom & Dad! It was only $0.61 to mail a 5x7 envelope? Ours cost $20 each!"

The invitations arrived [it's real now]

Friday, March 26, 2010
Our beautiful invitations have arrived! Having picked these out nearly a year ago, I am happy to present them (in slightly altered form, sorry):


They are beautiful to me now, but when I picked them up I was a little disappointed with the accent color, a neutral-ish shade of pink that was a little different from how it appeared in the store sample book. Also, it was a bit of a struggle to get these invitations designed in quite the right way (multiple proofs), and this probably added to the underwhelming-ness of seeing them for the first time.

But I got over it fast. The first thing that helped me get over my disappointment was seeing Mr. Oyster's reaction to the invitations. Earlier readers may remember that it was him who turned me on to these invitations in the first place -- he has excellent taste!

When he came home, I showed them to him without comment, to see what he'd say. He didn't say anything for a long time, but he just sort of stared at them, smiling. Finally he said, "We're getting married!" It was very sweet.

These invitations, of course, are not about shades of pink and cursive and script and fonts; they're the first announcement that my fiance and I intend to start a life together. Seeing him hold the invitations in his hands and really get that for the first time was priceless, and everything else I'd been worrying about suddenly mattered much less.

Another thing that helped was a little design tweak that was inexpensive and only took a few minutes! I decided to round the corners.

Smock can round the corners of your invitations for you, but we didn't select this when we ordered them. When they arrived, I knew it was the "something missing" that I needed to fix. I ventured into Hobby Lobby and found this sturdy-looking "Corner Chomper" and its cute matching case:

 

  

This is the perfect tool for this sort of thing; it cuts clean, perfectly curved corners, and holds up really well. It's perfect for the super thick card stock of our invitations. 

And now for the results! First, the before: 


 

This tool cuts two types of corners; a quarter inch (it appears that this is the shape the company uses if you have them round the corners)...

 

...and a half inch, which is the one we're going to use:

 

You can see the corners better in this shot:

 

I have to give major props to the Crop-a-dile. The corners it cuts are absolutely perfect... no flattening of the paper or extra weird notches. It's amazing how different the invitations look now. The softer edges really help our names to stand out, since they're now the only angled things on the invitation. I think the soft corners provide some much-needed balance and definition. Not only that, but with this hard cardstock, they're much easier to get in and out of the envelopes.

Oh, and another thing -- did you notice? Several of you mentioned wanting to see our invitation suite, and this is it. We went with our simple-is-best mantra with this wedding and decided to splurge on this one beautiful card (which we got on sale!) and eliminate the things that were less important to us. Even the language on the invitation is super-simplified.

So, no STDs, no response card, no postcard, no maps, no folding things, no menu, no programs. It's all on the website, including our rsvp! We'll see how that goes.

So for now, that's the story of our invites. Nothing left to do with them but send them out (but not until we finalize the guest list... oh, no!).

*Photos by me.

Worth a thousand (more) words

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Our lovely invitations, chosen by Mr. Oyster, are probably the only thing I've been 100% consistent about throughout this entire wedding planning process.

When it came time to order them, I'd decided that the wording should be simple and formal. Easy, right? I arrived at the shop with all the information in tow (typed up, no less!) and a day later, I got the call.

They wanted to change my invitation wording because it is improper!

Specifically, they want to change my "half past five" to "half after five" and we disagree about the usage of "two thousand ten" vs. "two thousand and ten." (They prefer the latter, by the way.) All my research says that both are acceptable, but it seems that "half after" and "two thousand and ten" are most likely related to British usage and are therefore more formal.

Two things at work here. First of all, I am having a formal wedding, which requires a formal invitation with formal wording. So I get that this is the time to be "correct."

But I wonder if these etiquette rules might just be too obscure for me. Who IN THE WORLD says "half after five"? I've never seen it; every wedding invitation I've seen says "half past." Every invitation also says "two thousand and ten" and since it looks better in print, I might concede that one. I might even write "half after" for the time... but I can just imagine my family calling up saying, "When is the wedding?"

On the other hand, just because large swaths of people don't understand an etiquette rule doesn't mean it's invalid.

We'll see. At this point, the invitation reads:

The pleasure of your company is requested at the marriage of
[Bride] and [Groom]

[Day] the [nth] of July
two thousand and ten

at half after (?) five in the evening

[Name of place]

[City, State]
 

[in the lower right hand corner]:
A reply is requested by the [Day] of [Month]

[website address]


I had originally written, "Please r.s.v.p. by [date], but realized that, while in English, "to r.s.v.p." is a verb or a noun, it's actually a phrase that already contains the word please (Respondez, s'il-vous plait). But most people will read it as a verb, so...

Honestly, I'm surprised that I care so much. But as someone who loves language, loves to write and is interested in what words mean to different people, this is actually kind of fascinating.

Also, I think it's funny how wedding invitations, like so many aspects of the wedding itself, bring out these issues of class and style. I think many wedding disputes we have now are the result of being in different classes, and, at least in the United States, of our society being in sort of a transitional period with different cultures & class systems. I mean, wouldn't this be easier (but so much more boring!) if every member of one family was in the same social class (and thus, had the same expectations for your wedding)? But, thankfully, hardly anyone can say that anymore. Interesting.

*The photo is of Emily Post, who frightens me a little.